How much compensation can you get for a motorcycle accident injury claim involving neck, shoulder, and psychological injuries in Western Australia? $374,060 is given to Motorbike Rider X for a motorcycle accident injury claim involving a labral tear, cervical spine injury, and psychological conditions like PTSD and adjustment disorder—here is everything you need to know about the personal injury law case: [2017] WADC 108.
Introduction to Motorbike Rider X’s motorcycle accident claim
The case of [2017] WADC 108 is a significant personal injury case heard in the District Court of Western Australia. It highlights the complexities involved in assessing damages for motor vehicle accidents, particularly when there are disputed issues around the extent of injuries, future earning capacity, and the reliability of the plaintiff’s evidence.
Background of the Motorcycle Compensation Claim
This is a motor vehicle injury claim arising from a motorcycle accident. The claim was brought under the Motor Vehicle (Third Party Insurance) Act 1943 (WA).
The plaintiff, Motorbike Rider X, was a 44-year-old education assistant working with special needs children at the time of the accident. She had been employed in this role since 2007 and enjoyed her work, which involved significant physical tasks such as managing behavioral problems, assisting with mobility, and other duties requiring the use of her arms. Her work hours generally ranged from 7:45 am to 3:15 pm. Prior to this, she had various jobs, including roles as a receptionist, settlement clerk, truck driver, and bar attendant.
Motorcycle accident injuries suffered
The plaintiff suffered multiple injuries in the accident, including:
- Soft tissue injury to the cervical spine resulting in neck pain and headaches
- Right shoulder injury requiring surgery, which included a labral tear repair, stabilization, and treatment for a Hill Sach’s lesion and subacromial bursitis
- Possible nerve root irritation involving the C5 nerve root, causing right arm pain
- Psychological injuries diagnosed as an adjustment disorder with anxiety and depression symptoms, with some experts also diagnosing post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)
- Additional injuries to her nose, chin, and left elbow, which were also noted in the judgment
Circumstances of the motorcycle Injury claim
On 7 December 2013, the plaintiff was riding a Harley-Davidson motorcycle on Abernethy Road in Byford, Western Australia. The defendant, Driver A, drove a motor vehicle onto the road without giving way, causing a collision. The plaintiff was thrown from her motorcycle onto the road.
Free Claim Check in 3 Minutes
Use our free Online Claim Check to find out where you stand and if you have a claim.
Start OnlineDismissal of the accident compensation claim against the second defendant
In addition to the 2013 accident, Motorbike Rider X was involved in a second motor vehicle accident on 21 November 2014, where she brought a claim against another defendant, Driver B.
However, this claim was dismissed because the second accident did not cause any significant injury and failed to meet the statutory threshold for non-pecuniary loss. This threshold is a specific legal standard that injuries must surpass to warrant compensation, and the court found the injuries from the second accident insufficient to meet this standard.
Main issues disputed in the motorbike accident claim
The key points of contention in this case were:
- The nature and extent of the plaintiff’s injuries, particularly the ongoing symptoms and disabilities
- The plaintiff’s future earning capacity and ability to return to work
- The need for and extent of future medical treatment and domestic assistance
- The reliability of the plaintiff’s evidence regarding her symptoms and disabilities
- The defendant’s contention that the plaintiff overstated her symptoms, with some symptoms potentially exacerbated by anxiety and the stress of litigation, which might diminish after the case was resolved
No Win, No Fee Lawyers
Under the No Win, No Fee arrangement, you won’t need to pay Foyle Legal’s Legal fees (the fees that we charge for the work we do on your claim), unless we get you a settlement amount.
Your lawyer will take you through this arrangement in more detail including any terms and conditions in your obligation free first initial consultation.
For quick information on our No Win, No Fee terms and disbursements, please visit our No Win No Fee Lawyers Page
Key medical evidence in this motorcycle accident compensation claim
Several medical experts provided evidence, including:
- Mr. Benjamin Kimberley (Orthopaedic Surgeon): Performed shoulder surgery and opined that the plaintiff’s ongoing arm symptoms were likely due to cervical spine injury, rather than the shoulder itself. Post-surgery, he noted mild shoulder stiffness and reduced range of motion, and he suspected that her cervical spine problems might preclude a full return to work.
- Dr. Michael Kent (Pain Management Specialist): Involved early in the plaintiff’s treatment, he proposed nerve root injections and noted the possibility of a C5 nerve root irritation, although later tests did not conclusively support this.
- Dr. Peter Silbert (Neurologist): Evaluated nerve conduction and concluded that there was no significant radiculopathy but more likely a facetal issue contributing to the plaintiff’s symptoms. He recommended rehabilitation to avoid aggravating the shoulder.
- Dr. Andrew Harper (Occupational Physician): Noted a deterioration in some symptoms, particularly in the neck, and significant psychological symptoms affecting work capacity. He highlighted that the plaintiff’s symptoms were consistent with a clinically significant injury, although he could not fully explain the deterioration in her condition.
- Dr. Nick de Felice (Psychiatrist): Diagnosed post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and adjustment disorder, predicting ongoing psychiatric symptoms that would impact her work capacity, though he anticipated some improvement after the litigation concluded.
- Dr. Eileen Tay (Psychiatrist): Examined the plaintiff and found that she did not meet the criteria for PTSD but had an adjustment disorder with prominent anxiety symptoms. Dr. Tay also noted the plaintiff’s history of alcohol consumption as a factor that might have contributed to her anxiety and frustration.
- Dr. Martin Flahive (Occupational Physician): Believed the plaintiff could return to full-time work as a mainstream education assistant within 6-8 weeks with rehabilitation, though not in her previous role with special needs children.
Findings by the District Court of Western Australia
The court made several key findings:
Reliability of plaintiff’s evidence:
The judge found the plaintiff to have inconsistencies in her statements but did not consider her to be deliberately dishonest. Her evidence was deemed unreliable due to inattention to detail and a lack of insight into her problems. The court also recognized that her symptoms and disabilities might have been exacerbated by anxiety and the stress of the litigation.
Injuries and ongoing symptoms:
The court accepted that the plaintiff suffered significant injuries, including a cervical injury causing ongoing right arm symptoms, and an adjustment disorder with anxiety symptoms. The court acknowledged the various expert opinions that attributed some of her symptoms to psychological factors rather than purely physical injury.
Work capacity and future loss of earning capacity:
The judge found that the plaintiff had lost the capacity to work as a special needs education assistant but retained some capacity for alternative employment.
The court acknowledged her acceptance of a redundancy in 2015, for which she received a tax-free payment of $33,387.32. Although there was potential for her to return to work as a mainstream education assistant, this remained uncertain given her ongoing symptoms. Her future loss of earning capacity was assessed based on the possibility of only being able to work part-time.
Impact on Personal Life
The court noted that the plaintiff’s partner, Caretaker Y, altered his employment to care for her, which underscores the impact of her injuries on her personal life and the extent of the support she required.
Caretaker Y also took over many household duties, such as lawn mowing and cleaning, while providing ongoing personal care, especially after her surgery.
Motorcycle Accident Compensation Amount
The total damages awarded were $374,060, broken down as follows:
- Non-pecuniary loss: $81,300
- Past loss of earning capacity: $92,000 (plus $5,900 interest)
- Past loss of superannuation: $8,800 (plus $560 interest)
- Future loss of earning capacity: $131,400
- Future loss of superannuation: $14,610
- Past services (paid): $4,200 (plus $420 interest)
- Past gratuitous services: $10,160 (plus $1,710 interest)
- Future gratuitous services: $13,000
- Future treatment expenses: $10,000
The total compensation amount of $374,060 was reached after a detailed assessment of each category of damages, including non-pecuniary loss, loss of earning capacity, superannuation, and future treatment expenses. This careful calculation reflects the court’s attempt to account for all areas of impact from Motorbike Rider X’s injuries.
Legal principles applied to the motorcycle accident injury compensation claim
The court applied several key legal principles in assessing damages:
- Section 3C of the Motor Vehicle (Third Party Insurance) Act 1943 for assessing non-pecuniary loss.
- The principles from Griffiths v Kerkemeyer and Van Gervan v Fenton for assessing damages for gratuitous services, emphasizing the need for compensating those who provide care due to the plaintiff’s injuries.
- The approach from Pene v Murphy and Montemaggiore v Wilson for assessing future loss of earning capacity, taking into account retained earning capacity and associated problems, and recognizing the plaintiff’s potential to work in alternative employment despite her injuries.
Implications and Significance in Future Accident Compensation claim
This case demonstrates the complex nature of assessing damages in personal injury cases, particularly when there are disputes about the extent of injuries and future earning capacity. It highlights the importance of:
- Credible and consistent evidence from plaintiffs
- Comprehensive medical evidence to support claims
- Careful consideration of future earning capacity, taking into account both medical evidence and labor market factors
The case also underscores the value of rehabilitation in supporting recovery. The court noted that while Motorbike Rider X initially engaged in some rehabilitation, her failure to pursue further treatment likely affected her long-term recovery. Proper rehabilitation can be a key factor in proving ongoing disability and securing appropriate compensation.
Guide for Injured Riders: Maximizing Your Motorcycle Accident Compensation
If you’ve been injured in a motorcycle accident, understanding the key issues in your claim for compensation can help you avoid common pitfalls and ensure you receive the compensation you’re entitled to. This guide, based on [2017] WADC 108 case study, provides practical advice to help you navigate the process and avoid disputes that could affect your motorbike accident compensation.
Get a Specialist Motorcycle Accident Lawyer Early
One of the most critical steps in claiming compensation after a motorcycle accident is getting a personal injury lawyer involved as soon as possible. Motorcycle accident compensation lawyers specialize in understanding the unique challenges motorcyclists face, including the nature of injuries and the complexities of proving fault. Early involvement of a lawyer ensures that your claim for compensation is handled professionally from the outset, helping to prevent disputes over the extent of injuries, future earning capacity, and the reliability of evidence.
Document Your Injuries Thoroughly
In this case study, disputes arose over the nature and extent of the plaintiff’s injuries, particularly regarding ongoing symptoms and disabilities. To avoid similar issues, it’s crucial to document your injuries thoroughly from the moment of the accident. This includes obtaining detailed medical reports for all injuries, such as neck pain, shoulder injuries, and psychological conditions like PTSD or adjustment disorder. Your motorcycle accident compensation lawyer will use this documentation to build a strong case for your claim for motorcycle accident compensation.
Accurately Assess Future Earning Capacity
The assessment of future earning capacity can be a significant point of contention in accident compensation claims. In the case study, the plaintiff’s ability to return to work was a major issue. Ensure that any impact on your work capacity is thoroughly documented, including potential long-term effects on your ability to perform your job. Your lawyer will work with medical experts to accurately assess how your injuries might affect your future earning potential, which is critical when claiming personal injury compensation.
Be Honest and Consistent with Your Evidence
Inconsistent evidence can severely impact your claim for motorbike accident compensation. In the case study, the plaintiff was found to be a “poor historian,” which affected the credibility of her claim. To avoid this, always be honest and consistent in your statements. Keep detailed records of your symptoms, treatments, and how the injury has affected your life. This consistency will help your lawyer present a credible and reliable case when claiming compensation for a motorcycle accident.
Understand the Legal Principles Applied
The court, in this case applied several key legal principles when assessing damages, including those from Griffiths v Kerkemeyer and Van Gervan v Fenton for assessing damages for gratuitous services. Understanding these principles can help you better navigate the legal process and set realistic expectations for your motorbike accident compensation. Your motorcycle accident compensation lawyer will explain how these principles apply to your specific case.
Claim Compensation for All Relevant Aspects
When you claim compensation, it’s important to consider all aspects of your injury and its impact on your life. This includes not just the physical injuries but also psychological impacts, future medical needs, and any necessary domestic assistance. In this case, the court considered various factors, including the plaintiff’s ongoing need for treatment and support. Ensure that your claim for motorcycle accident compensation covers all these areas to maximize your personal injury compensation.
Protect Your Rights and Maximize Your Motorbike Accident Compensation
Navigating the claim for compensation after a motorcycle accident can be complex, but by following the advice in this guide, you can avoid common disputes and strengthen your case. Engage a specialist motorcycle accident compensation lawyer early, document your injuries thoroughly, and be consistent with your evidence. Understanding the legal process and ensuring that all aspects of your injury are covered will help you secure the compensation you are entitled to.
For those in Western Australia, working with experienced motorcycle accident compensation lawyers is key to protecting your rights and maximizing your compensation for a motorcycle accident. If you’re injured in a car or motorbike accident, don’t delay—seek legal advice as soon as possible to ensure your claim is handled correctly from the start.
Seeking Motor accident compensation lawyers in WA?
If you’ve been involved in a motorcycle accident in Western Australia, it’s crucial to act quickly to secure the compensation you deserve. At Foyle Legal, we are one of the top-rated personal injury and workers compensation lawyers in WA. We understand the unique challenges riders face, whether you’re dealing with a road accident, an insurance claim, or proving fault for the accident.
The law in WA gives you a strict 3-year limitation period from the date of the accident to make a motorcycle accident claim, so it’s important to get started as soon as possible. Our expert motorcycle accident lawyers can guide you through every step of the claim process, from reporting the accident to the police to completing the claim form. We operate on a No Win No Fee basis, ensuring that you can pursue your claim without financial stress.
Don’t wait—contact Foyle Legal today. Our team will provide you with the expert support you need, helping you to navigate the complexities of your claim and maximize your compensation. Whether your injury was caused by the accident while riding a motorcycle or as a result of a motorbike accident, our motorcycle accident injury lawyers can advise you on your eligibility to make a claim. Let us help you claim the compensation you’re entitled to—because your recovery and peace of mind are our top priorities.
Conclusion and Current Relevance
The [2017] WADC 108 case illustrates the challenges faced in quantifying damages for personal injuries, particularly when ongoing symptoms and disputed future earning capacity are involved. This case emphasizes the importance of thorough medical evidence and the careful consideration of a plaintiff’s individual circumstances when assessing damages. For those involved in a motorbike accident, it highlights how crucial it is to have experienced claim lawyers who specialize in personal injury claims on your side.
In Western Australia, this case remains highly relevant as it provides a detailed example of how courts assess damages in motor vehicle injury cases, especially those involving multiple injuries and complex psychological impacts. It serves as a valuable reference for any motorbike accident lawyer or law firm handling similar cases. Whether you were injured as a result of a car accident or a motorbike accident, understanding the application of key legal principles and the evaluation of medical evidence is essential in securing the compensation you are entitled to claim.
The case also underscores the importance of timely legal action, as those eligible to make a claim must do so within 3 years of the accident. Consulting with accident lawyers as soon as possible after your accident is crucial, as they can help ensure that all necessary evidence is gathered from the accident scene and that your claim is handled effectively. Whether it’s months after the accident or immediately following the incident, seeking legal advice early on can significantly improve your chances of being able to claim the compensation you deserve.
Obligation Free Call 
