Quick Answers
If you’re injured on someone else’s property in WA, understanding premises liability vs. negligence is crucial. Property owners have a legal duty to maintain safe premises. If they fail, and you’re injured, you may have a personal injury claim. However, contributory negligence could reduce your compensation if you’re partly at fault. Know your rights, act quickly, and gather strong evidence to protect your claim.
What Do These Terms Mean?
Tort law is an area of law which arises when one person (the Defendant) commits a “wrong” to another person (the Plaintiff) and the Plaintiff suffers loss or damage.
The occupiers of premises have long been held to owe persons upon their premises a duty to take reasonable care at common law. In Western Australia premises liability has been codified in the Occupiers’ Liability Act 1985 (WA).
The Occupiers’ Liability Act 1985 (WA) imposes a statutory duty on occupiers of premises to exercise reasonable care to ensure entrants are not exposed to hazards within their control.
Negligence is a sub-area of tort law. It arose through case law and has since been codified in Western Australia in part in the Civil Liability Act 2002.
To prove negligence, the Defendant must owe the Plaintiff a duty of care. A personal injury claim generally arises in negligence where the Defendant breaches their duty of care to the Plaintiff causing injury or damage. To start a negligence claim, you must show:
- Duty of Care: The defendant had a legal obligation to keep you safe.
- Breach: The defendant did not meet that duty.
- Causation: Their breach directly caused your personal injury.
- Damage: You suffered tangible harm or financial loss.
These elements are central to any negligence claim under WA law.
Spotting the Legal Loophole
Key Elements in Negligence Cases: Damage, Breach & Causation
To win a negligence case, a litigant must prove:
- A breach of duty (e.g., a business failed to fix a hazard).
- That this breach caused harm (e.g., a slip resulted in a broken wrist).
- That damage (medical bills, lost income) is measurable.
For example, two cars may collide and it may be easy for the Plaintiff to prove that the car accident occurred due to the fault of the Defendant and the Defendant was negligent, however, if the Plaintiff had a back injury prior to the accident and similar symptoms following the accident, the Plaintiff may find it difficult to hold the Defendant to account regarding the damages claimed.
Understanding jurisdiction is also crucial, as Australian law varies between Australian states, for instance between WA and NSW.
In Western Australia, personal injury claim disputes are very common. If a claim cannot be settled then the Plaintiff may need to commence legal proceedings in order to pursue the matter further.
Contributory Negligence
A major gap many overlook is contributory negligence. This happens when you, as the injured party, share some blame for the accident. For example, if you ignore a clear warning sign, the compensation that you receive may be reduced. This legal loophole is an important part of the law in WA and can cost you dearly.
Comparison Table: Premises Liability vs. Negligence
| Key Element | Premises Liability | Negligence |
|---|---|---|
Duty of Care | Property owners must ensure safe premises. | Generally imposes a duty of care to take reasonable care to ensure a person is not exposed to a reasonably foreseeable hazard. |
Breach | Failure to maintain a safe premises. | Failure to exercise reasonable care in circumstances where a duty of care is established. |
| Direct link between unsafe conditions and injury. | The Plaintiff will need to determine whether the breach directly injures the plaintiff. | |
Impact of Contributory Negligence | Can reduce your claim. | May lessen compensation if you share blame. |
This table shows how both terms overlap but also where the impact lies.
Step-by-Step Guide to Protecting Your Rights
If you face a personal injury claim due to premises liability or negligence, follow these steps:
- Document the Scene
- Snap photos and jot down details.
- Record anything that shows the breach or damage.
- Speak to Witnesses
- Ask for contact details and notes on what they saw.
- Their words can support your claim in litigation.
- Seek Immediate Medical Attention
- Get treatment right away.
- Keep all records for your case.
- Gather Evidence
- Save receipts and records of any expenses.
- This helps establish the cause of action against the defendant.
- Consult an Expert
- Talk to a WA-based personal injury lawyer.
- They can check if the breach meets the elements of negligence.
- Review Your Claim Promptly
- WA’s Limitation Act 2005 (WA) sets a strict time limit—usually three years.
- Don’t wait too long before you speak to a legal expert.
For more details on protecting your rights, check out our Personal Injury page and our Free Claim Check.
Real Case Litigation Examples
Case 1: Gladstone v Public Transport Authority of Western Australia [2022] WADC 6
In this case, the plaintiff, Gladstone, sued the Public Transport Authority after sustaining injuries on their premises. The court examined whether the Authority had breached its duty of care under the Occupiers’ Liability Act 1985 (WA). Ultimately, the court found that the Authority did not breach its duty, highlighting the complexities involved in such claims.
Case 2: Nagle v Rottnest Island Authority [1993] HCA 76
In this case, the plaintiff, Mr. Nagle, suffered a severe injury after diving into a natural pool at Rottnest Island, WA. Despite the area being a popular swimming spot, there were no warning signs about the potential dangers. The High Court of Australia found that the Rottnest Island Authority breached its duty of care by failing to warn visitors of the risks, leading to Mr. Nagle’s injury. This case underscores the responsibility of property occupiers in WA to proactively identify hazards and inform visitors, thereby preventing potential injuries.
It is important to know that lawyers generally consider the Nagle v Rottnest Island Authority case to be the “high point” of occupiers being found liable for injuries to occupants and most would agree that liability has generally been found to be reduced since that time underscoring the importance of obtaining legal advice.
WA-Specific Considerations
Workplace Injuries & Premises Liability
It is often the case that workers are injured in the course of their employment but whilst on the premises of another person. For instance, they could be working for their employer staying at a FIFO camp, but the FIFO camp is controlled by another company. In this situation, the worker may have both a workers’ compensation and a premises liability claim.
WorkCover WA is the dispute resolution authority that covers workplace injuries. Generally but third-party negligence claims are pursued in the District Court.
Rental Property Injuries: Can You Sue Your Landlord?
Landlords must maintain safe rental properties, but tenants also have obligations.
If a tenant fails to report a hazard, contributory negligence may apply, reducing compensation.
What If the Property Owner Refuses to Provide Insurance Details?
If a property owner or business refuses to provide insurance information, you can request details through legal channels.
A personal injury lawyer can help access insurance records through legal discovery processes.
Delayed Injury Reporting: Will It Affect My Claim?
If you don’t report an incident immediately, CCTV footage, witnesses, and medical records can still support your case.
However, waiting too long weakens credibility, so document everything as soon as possible.
Can Poor Security or Lighting Be a Premises Liability Issue?
If a lack of security leads to an assault or injury, the property owner may be liable.
Example: A poorly lit car park where attacks frequently occur could result in a successful premises liability claim.
Common Defenses Used by Property Owners
Assumption of Risk: If a plaintiff knowingly enters a hazardous area, the defendant may argue they accepted the risk.
Contributory Negligence: If the injured person contributed to their accident, the court may reduce compensation.
No Foreseeable Danger: Property owners may claim the hazard was not foreseeable, predictable or preventable.
Recent Legal Developments in WA
Work Safety and Health Regulations: Enhanced workplace safety rules affect employer obligations for work-related premises liability cases.
Proposed Amendments to WA Civil Liability Laws: Ongoing discussions to improve protections for public liability claimants.
FAQs
Q: What is the main difference between premises liability and negligence?
A: Premises liability focuses on property occupier duties. Negligence covers a wider range of failures to meet a reasonable person’s standard of care.
Q: How does contributory negligence affect my claim?
A: If you share some fault, your compensation may be reduced. It’s key to document everything to show the defendant’s primary breach.
Q: How soon should I act if I suffer an injury?
A: Get help right away. Document evidence, seek medical attention, and check with a WA legal expert to ensure you don’t miss the three-year claim window.
Q: Can I still get compensation if I was partly at fault?
A: Yes, but the compensation amount may be reduced. A detailed record can help prove the defendant’s greater liability.
💡 Take the Right Steps to Protect Your Claim
Understanding premises liability vs. negligence is crucial in securing fair compensation for your injury. Making a mistake—like filing against the wrong party or missing key evidence—can lead to claim rejection or reduced payouts.
✅ Need clarity on your legal rights? Speak with a WA personal injury lawyer to ensure you’re on the right track.
📞 Book a free claim check today and get expert guidance on your public liability or negligence claim.
Don’t risk losing your rightful compensation—get informed, act early, and protect your legal rights.
Obligation Free Call 
